![]() oil and gas production - which the Biden administration has actually sought to boost in the last year to lower gasoline prices. oil exports were banned for decades until Congress legalized them that year - and since then, the overseas shipments have become a bright spot for the nation’s trade balance, turning the United States into one of the world’s top oil suppliers.īlocking exports anew would likely depress U.S. ![]() Most notable among them is a 2015 law that allows the president to restrict the export of crude oil during a national emergency. Most are related to military powers, but some in theory could be used to combat climate change. So what could Biden do about climate change if he decided to go for broke - issuing the same kind of emergency declaration that former President Donald Trump used to steer money toward his border wall? A lot: Blocking oil exportsĪ total of 136 potential powers are available to the president upon declaring a national emergency, though some involve certain caveats or are subject to congressional authorization, according to research compiled by New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice. “This is like a game of Russian roulette.” “The White House knows doing anything to invoke emergency powers will be immediately legally challenged and cause markets to react in a negative fashion,” he said. It would not be risk-free, though, said Stephen Brown, a former energy lobbyist who heads RBJ Strategies, because any bold move is likely to spook energy markets and drive up prices. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) told reporters this week. ![]() “There’s a lot, lot, lot left to be done,” Sen. Such a show of commitment would also help soothe younger voters and people who care deeply about climate change, Biden’s allies argue. “If I were the president I would be asking my staff for a list of all of my authorities, and I would be evaluating all of them for what pieces of this challenge they could solve,” Sen. But Biden’s allies said he can still send the signal that the world’s largest economy is leaning into clean energy, and the jobs its supporters say it will produce. ![]() Biden still has actions he can take using his non-emergency executive authority.īut none of those actions could produce the $300 billion in clean energy spending that his dead Build Back Better legislation would have provided, create a national carbon-trading system, or revive the Obama-era power plant rule that SCOTUS scuttled last month. The appearance is meant to send the message that Biden is not totally powerless on climate change, despite last month’s Supreme Court rebuke and the collapse of Democrats’ year-long effort to push a major climate bill through Congress. Instead, he used his speech on Wednesday in front of a coal-plant-turned-wind-power project in Somerset, Mass., to announce efforts to power more homes using offshore wind, expand programs for low-income households to buy efficient air conditioners and deploy $2.3 billion to bolster community climate resilience. ![]() A resident looks on as flames advance during a wildfire in Pumarejo de Tera in Spain on July 18, 2022.īiden isn’t going the emergency route for now, the White House says. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |